The UK Medical Law - the Ethical Dilemma of Euthanasia Research Paper

The UK Medical Law - the Ethical Dilemma of Euthanasia - Research Paper Example There are some cases that will be identified and included in this research to fully discuss the true meaning in behind if euthanasia is considered legally and illegally permissible in medical cases where the patient is terminally ill.   Also, the emphasis is given as to when medical treatment can be legally withdrawn due to the futility of the medical illness.   In the conclusion, this research points out that although there are legal restraints preventing doctors to engage in treatments that result in the patients’ life being taken, there are numerous ethical considerations that have to be taken into account as well.   Within cases like these, nothing is ever easy, especially when it involves someone who is terminally ill and has no hope of survival.      Euthanasia has been in heated debate for a good while now within the UK.   However, there have been numerous changes taking place within its concept but one must ask do these changes go along with the old idea that insinuates any doctors or family members who engage in treatment regimens that are ultimately meant for ending the patients life should still be held legally liable in a court of law and from there face criminal charges from prosecution?Unfortunately, within the UK there are still legal grounds that are enforced in regards to anyone who ends another’s life regardless of whether it was for a medical reason or whether the individual wanted assistance in ending their life period.   It is not legally permissible or ethical to carry out medical cases such as these but it is being done anyway.   However, those who want to die will search for any means possible such as with cases where patients have traveled to Switzerland to have doctors there perform assisted suic ides or euthanasia procedures because it is legal in that country (Spinney 2005).   The point is that no one wants to have to suffer unbearable and excruciating agony with an illness that has no hope of a cure or adequate treatment program available.   In this regard, the UK needs to realize that its citizens deserve to have the right to die in a dignified fashion when they deem it is appropriate, not when the government states it is logical.   In this case, there is no fallible reason found in the statement that medical treatment should be legally impermissible if it is being carried out in correlation with the patients’ right to die.  

Analyze the in Office Ancillary Services Exception to the Stark Act as Research Paper

Analyze the in Office Ancillary Services Exception to the Stark Act as it relates to block leases - Research Paper Example he medical practitioner is financially associated with the care services; and d) the medical practitioner implements referrals to a care provider for purposes of furnishing the DHS. Physicians and health practices depend on the in-office ancillary services and related medical practice exceptions to the Stark law to permit DHS referrals within the parameters of the practice. Of these, Washlick (2008) noted that the in-office ancillary services exception is most commonly applied because it enables physicians providing various services to: a) make referrals for select DHS within the confines of medical practice; b) inform those DHS to provide the necessary patient care; c) apply Medicare and Medicaid cover to defray the costs resulting from the services; and d) retain and channel the revenues collected from rendering the services within the practice for settling practice expenditure and physician remuneration. These exclusions are therefore of great value to the rendering of patient services and other internal activities. As Micklos and Sevell (2004) noted, the in-office ancillary services exception (IOASE) is arguably the most significant allowance given under the outlaw of self-referrals of select health services by medical practitioners. In the recent past, however, renewed attempts to revisit referral rules have threatened the effectiveness of physician practice. For instance, the federal budget for the 2014-2015 financial year contains a number of measures which are intended to enhance a greater level of proper remuneration for the proper rendering of health care under the Medicare platform. The budget is responsive to various recommendations by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and MedPac that self-referral of simpler services culminates in a higher volume of care when they are integrated with payments for the service fees (Clark, Johnstone, Lynch, & Cardenas, 2004). The Budget seeks to limit the IOASE by permitting only practitioners who meet given